Inflation and the Living Wage Debate

Spread the love

In a recent Money & Sense article, I covered how the Employment Development Department (EDD) and their lucrative bonus payments to the unemployed has essentially made the national $15/hr. minimum wage debate a moot point. Another contentious debate called the “Living Wage” debate, will likely now be turned on its head as the higher wages forced up by the EDD payments will result in exposing the vicious cycle of wage push inflation and its effect on the living wage.

Not only has the minimum wage debate been obsoleted by the EDD payments, but those same payments are now causing even faster inflation in the economy than previously witnessed.

We can see this new “wage push” inflation as businesses in many instances, are offering over $15/hr. to entice potential workers to get off the couch and come back to work.

As inflation takes off, I have seen more and more commentary stating that the $15/hr, rate, which was previously determined by some to approach the so-called “living wage”, is now grossly insufficient as consumer prices skyrocket. 

There is a reason why what once was determined to be at least close to a sufficient living wage is now quickly being dismissed as grossly deficient. Plainly put, an economic reality is occurring. 

Although higher wages are not the sole cause for higher consumer prices, higher wages coupled with the recent spike in commodity prices are crippling business balance sheets as operational costs soar.

In a free-market environment, businesses will always pass increased costs onto the consumer through higher prices and that is what is occurring. 

Inflation is starting to burn hot and that fact is confirmed by the most recent inflation data out from Uncle Sam, which shows an annual inflation rate of over 4%.  Many analysts claim government inflation figures vastly understate the real inflation rate. If that is true, the real rate might be even higher

What happens next is why the living wage proponents are calling for even higher wages. As wages rise, consumer prices follow. Therefore, with each increase in the wage rate, inflation rises even faster, negating the previous increases. A vicious cycle yet a familiar one to astute economists.

Many argue against the very concept of a living wage, saying it is arbitrary and doesn’t consider geographic realities. An example would be the cost of living in New York compared to living in Modesto. 

Others claim a more sinister thing is at work here. Wage inflation will always push consumer costs faster and higher than the so-called “living wage.” Because of this fact, many argue, including this analyst, that the living wage debate is a nonsensical argument. 

Since it is an accepted fundamental in the study of economics that wages will always lag consumer price inflation, the argument is put forth that the living wage can never be reached by mandating wages ever higher. In fact, those very same mandates may be the cause of the problem.  Inflation will always “outrun” wages and it is why some find themselves repeatedly calling for an even higher living wage, and then wondering why it is never enough.

Opponents to the minimum wage mandates, which include opposing the very concept of a “living wage” (which is an arbitrary opinion depending on who’s making the argument), point to the fact that an unmolested capitalistic system would correct wage/inflation conflicts. The argument is extended to address the failure of the current capitalistic system and blaming it as the cause of wage deficiencies.  Many believe the current system is one that has been highly manipulated away from capitalism because of massive government monetary intervention, which distorts the checks and balances of a capitalistic system. 

The result is what we see now: insufficient wage rates exasperated by rising prices and a constant call for higher and higher wages.  

No matter which side of the argument ones believes, we must acknowledge that a true solution to a problem solves it. Conversely, repeated attempts signify failure. 

The minimum wage has been raised 22 times to combat inflation. In the face of these increases, it never seems to be enough, and living wage proponents find themselves constantly calling for ever higher wages. The cycle is akin to a cat chasing its tail, which is an attempt in futility. 

In conclusion, income inequality is at least partially caused by inflation, which in turn owes its existence to the very same wage policies that attempt to correct it.

Opinions expressed here are those of Mr. Cuniberti and not those of any bank or investment advisory firm. Nothing stated is meant to insure a guarantee, or to be construed as investment advice. Neither Money Management Radio (“Money Matters”) receive, control, access or monitor client funds, accounts, or portfolios. For a list of the services offered by Mr. Cuniberti, call (530)559-1214. California Insurance License #0L34249 and Medicare Agent approved.  Insurance services offered independently through Marc Cuniberti and not affiliated with any RIA firm or entity. Email: [email protected].

Marc Cuniberti

Marc Cuniberti

Marc Cuniberti
Host of Money Matters Radio on 67 radio stations nationwide, Financial and insurance columnist for the Union and 5 other statewide newspapers, owner BAP insurance and registered financial advisor representative at Vantage Financial. California Insurance License OL34249 and feature on ABC and NBC television and a host of TV documentaries on his financial insights.